They were one of the biggest userbases that was still federated.

    • Disa@burggit.moeM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is my opinion on it. There was no way we’d be federated with a Canadian instance for long. Though, their defederation does seem to be the admin’s own emotional reaction as opposed to the actually reasonable legal issues they might face.

  • mcuglys@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m disappointed honestly. I still think that Lemmy would be well served by some community flag other than NSFW that makes certain communities a little more hidden. I also do think it was a bit of a knee jerk reaction, but its hard to criticize when they can say “its Canada law”.

    I also disagree with Canada law on this, but Canadians seem pretty happy to elect people who tell them what to think, so IDK.

    • Disa@burggit.moeM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Someone made a suggestion on here that a tag feature, where instances could add their own tags which could be used to mark content on a per-instance basis. These tags would have basic controls on what happens when a post/comment has one of these tags applied to them.

      I definitely think this would be a great feature, though I have my doubts about it ever being developed.

  • CyanParsnips@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The discussion there makes me sad. On a practical level defederation is a reasonable inevitability, but the level of vitriol in there is neither productive nor healthy, for anyone.

    “Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.”

    • livixPmfOQRj@burggit.moe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I find it amusing how often these groups say “No bigotry” in their rules, but make the exception whenever it fits their beliefs. Almost like it’s virtue signalling or something.

      Not to mention the predictable “No *phobia”. Which in of itself is intolerance of other views.

      • shani66@burggit.moe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s an incredibly stupid point, my dude, ot to be a dick or anything.

        Edit: i figured i might look like a dick if i leave it there so; no one cares about being intolerant, intolerance is a virtue. People care about what you are intolerant about.

        • CyanParsnips@burggit.moe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think their point is that it’s hypocritical how people often mean that (‘people should be intolerant of things I think are bad’) when saying the opposite (‘intolerance is bad’). For those who do care about intolerance and do think it’s bad - certainly not no one - it’s confusing and frustrating and sad.

    • Disa@burggit.moeM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Couldn’t agree more. What I see there is knee-jerk reactions and a lot of, well just like you put it, vitriol, which I think is the perfect way to describe it.

  • MomoNeedsCorrection@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Literally what prompted me to make an account here. Would definitely rather be on an instance where they aren’t just doing a reddit% speedrun of terrible moderation

  • doritospineapple@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It looks like we’ll become one of those “islands” in the so called fediverse. There’s the growing continent of Rexxit refugees across the pond.

    But I’m okay with that. We don’t need to share space with far right lunatics this time, so we can focus on lewd stuff.