• Pēteris Krišjānis@toot.lv
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      @0x815 comfort of group think. For most people, ease of use is what draws them to social networking. Federation is something they don’t grasp that easily, and they don’t understand danger of concentrating power on one platform.
      I still think it is great Fediverse is here and evolves. It won’t attract huge numbers of users, but it might not need to to keep going.

      • 0x815@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have been discussing this with friends for a while. Ease of use is a thing, but what is so complicated, for example, with using Mastodon over Twitter and XMPP over Whatsapp? The UI is different and you need to choose a client and so, but “ease of use”? They are all easy enough imo.

        But I fully agree that people don’t understand the danger of a centralized power and the social consequences it has.

        • wiredfire@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fedi isn’t hard to use, it’s just slightly different than centralised services with an extra step or two. None of which are hard to grasp, literally everyone online has federated communication in the form of email, but we can never underestimate the capacity of general users to put more effort into resisting change than actual change would take. It’s infuriating 😅

          • Lohrun@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s why Apple is popular, ease of use for the average person is important. The more streamlined and fool proof you can make things, the easier the adoption is. (Apple might have been a bad example because their whole thing is much more complex)