WhoRoger@lemmy.world to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agoWebsites telling me what I can do with my own browser so they can have their pointless cookieslemmy.worldimagemessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up177arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up174arrow-down1imageWebsites telling me what I can do with my own browser so they can have their pointless cookieslemmy.worldWhoRoger@lemmy.world to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square76fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarePumpedSardines@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 year agoI feel like for straw poll it’s more valid, they probably do it to try and avoid people voting more than once.
minus-squareditherwither@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYes, but if you wanted to, you can write a script that mass votes and bypasses this (if there is no captcha)
minus-squareWhoRoger@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down3·1 year agoA bit yes, but any technique like that can be used to fingerprint and deanonymize users.
minus-squarebustrpoindextr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYes, but that’s the only way you can trust electronic voting, by removing anonymity
I feel like for straw poll it’s more valid, they probably do it to try and avoid people voting more than once.
Yes, but if you wanted to, you can write a script that mass votes and bypasses this (if there is no captcha)
A bit yes, but any technique like that can be used to fingerprint and deanonymize users.
Yes, but that’s the only way you can trust electronic voting, by removing anonymity