AI singer-songwriter ‘Anna Indiana’ debuted her first single ‘Betrayed by this Town’ on X, formerly Twitter—and listeners were not too impressed.

  • aiccount@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes, it is literally impossible for any AI to ever exist that can be creative. At no point in the future will it ever create anything creative, that is something only human beings can do. Anybody that doesn’t understand this is simply incapable of using logic and they have no right to contribute to the conversation at all. This has all already been decided by people who understand things really well and anyone who objects is obviously stupid.

      • aiccount@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was agreeing with you. I’m so sick of people thinking that “someday AI might be creative”. Like no, it’s literally impossible unless some day AI becomes human(impossible) because human is the only thing capable of creativity. What have I said that you disagree with? You’re not one of them are you? What’s with all this obsessive AI love?

          • aiccount@monyet.cc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah the current popular LLMs, absolutely they are, you couldn’t be more right.

            We were talking about “AI” though. Are you implying that you think some day AI might be capable of creativity, and that creativity isn’t strictly a human trait?

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I put “AI” in scare quotes specifically because I do not believe we are having an “AI revolution”. These are not AI.

              I think AI can exist but that’s not what we have right now. What we have are jumped up algos that can somewhat fake it.

              • aiccount@monyet.cc
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Even those future “real” AIs are going to be taking in human input and regurgitating it back to us. The only difference is that the algorithms processing the data will continue to get better and better. There is not some cutoff where we go from 100% unintelligent chatbot to 100% intelligent AI. It is a gradual spectrum.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I believe a real AI would be able to generate its own inputs without humans to give it input. It would have an actual subjective experience, able to actually imagine new things with zero external inputs. It could experience the redness of the color red.

                  • aiccount@monyet.cc
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Is this how you see human intelligence? Is human intelligence made without the input of other humans? I understand that even babies have some sort of spark before they learn anything from other people, but dont they have the human dna input from their human parents? Why should the requirement for AI intelligence require no human input when even human intelligence seemingly requires human input to be made?

                    Sorry, lots of questions, just food for thought I suppose.