Elon Musk’s financial interests put him in a position of having his own personal foreign policy, but new reporting shows that whether it’s manufacturing in China or the Starlink network being used in Ukraine, Musk’s decisions can run counter to stated US policy.

  • FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Last I heard, he simply didn’t turn it on when Ukraine asked him to, before the DoD had explicitly contracted him to support Ukraine’s military. The narrative of him throwing a switch mid-attack and laughing maniacally as Ukrainian drones drifted helplessly to shore has been spreading like wildfire but that seems to be based on a quote from one guy who has since walked it back.

    Is there some Fediverse equivalent to /r/enoughmuskspam? My feed is starting to get flooded with these five-minute-hates of Elon Musk and it’s wearying.

    • drewdarko@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nope, Starlink was already in use. Musk used his position as CEO of Starlink to cut off service to Ukraine. But only long enough to interrupt a counter attack on the Russian fleet. Once the opportunity had passed he had it turned back on.

      His intentions are obvious.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What is it with this complete lack of nuance surrounding things? Elon Musk is not my hero. He’s a terrible human being, by everything I’ve read about him as a person. But just being a terrible human being doesn’t mean that every negative rumor or clickbait headline that shows up about him must automatically be true.

        Bill Cosby is a terrible human being, for example. Hey, I heard he eats kittens! Let’s circulate that news, it must be true because Bill Cosby is awful.