“It’s ILLEGAL to steal peoples money”
“source?”
Make me remember a conversation a guy claim he could easily went 2000 miles in one day, another response even at 70mph it would take more than a day, the guy just reply SOURCE? like some kind of trained reaction
“Clause two of the anti robber 1898 act”
“Im not reading that”
(I have no understanding of the law)
this is what arguing with anyone on the internet feels like
Strawman fallacy.
Fallacy fallacy.
Phallacy fallacy. Aka: you’re wrong, suck my dick
Are you gaslighting me?!
Survivalship bias
deleted by creator
I don’t think the second one is whataboutism?
Funnily enough, the guy refusing to give their bank details IS presenting poor arguments. Of course, this is assuming that both parties have consented to enter a debate. If this was indeed a debate, it would kinda delve into a debate over the objectivity/subjectivity of morality as a whole.