• TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s like calling every photo of you a fucking selfie. It’s only a selfie if you did it yourself of yourself. The end.

      And yeah, I’m with you. Now every funny picture is a meme. No, it’s just a funny picture.

      Now get off my lawn!

      • Sunforged@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        You got my meme response now you get my academic reply.

        A meme is a remix of an existing idea/joke/image. Unless you are creating something new whole cloth it could be considered a meme. Even though the term hadn’t been coined, what Mark was doing with 3/4 of those autographs was altering the context of the card image, thus he did create memes.

        Now get off my lawn.

        • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Actually the term was coined all the way back in the 70s, by Richard Dawkins in his book The Selfish Gene.

          It means a cultural gene. It’s a piece of culture that is so pervasive it can be said to be a part of the genetic code of the society. Examples are the smiley face, tic tac toe or other simple common games, that S thing we all drew as kids, etc.

          Not all jokes are memes, and not all memes are jokes.

          • solstice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It bugs me when people call any stupid little picture or comic a meme. It also bugs me when people say they are making a meme. One does not simply “make” a meme. It must become a meme on its own. Now if you’ll excuse me I’ve got some clouds to yell at.

          • Sunforged@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is the only well articulated rebuttal I have gotten so thank you for that. I still disagree on the usage of pervasive in the definition especially in the context of internet memes. A meme is culture spread person to person and while traditional memes such as the ones you listed are defined by their longevity, internet memes are often flash in the pan or incredibly niche.

            Is it a meme now?

      • dezmd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        My old manual Minolta SR-7 camera had a timer button for selfies. I was cool before it was cool to be cool.

        Listen up boomer, if you didn’t want people on your lawn, you shouldn’t have moved into a NIMBY WASPspsps HOA neighborhood.

        /issues fines for grass over 1.12 inches high

    • iorale@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even worse, something only could be called “meme” if it became viral, when it touched the mainstream (usually being used on tv) it died and people moved on.
      Now it’s basically “when everything is a meme, nothing will be”.

    • Kethal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was going to ask what people mean when they say “meme” now, because they do not seem to be using the word the way that I use it.

      • Sunforged@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme. A meme acts as a unit for carrying cultural ideas, symbols, or practices, that can be transmitted from one mind to another through writing, speech, gestures, rituals, or other imitable phenomena with a mimicked theme. Supporters of the concept regard memes as cultural analogues to genes in that they self-replicate, mutate, and respond to selective pressures. In popular language, a meme may refer to an Internet meme, typically an image, that is remixed, copied, and circulated in a shared cultural experience online.

        Per Wikipedia, emphasis on what I consider the relevant bits. What way do you use it?

        • Kernal64@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          By your own highlighted parts, the cards in the OP are not memes. People don’t alter pictures of those signed cards and they don’t mutate. They don’t change via selective pressures as we don’t see new versions where people change the image or the text. Additionally, those pictures of the trading cards are not remixed. They’re shared unaltered. The OP is missing key traits of being a meme. The OP is a picture of some funny jokes that Mark Hamil wrote on some trading cards he autographed. They’re certainly entertaining, but they’re not memes.

          • Sunforged@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t think you understand what the concept of mutation/remix is then. “A horrified Luke sees his family killed” and then writing over it something cheeky about newfound freedom vastly alters (mutates) how the image is interpreted. “Selectice Pressures” could be something like a topical joke based on current events, in this case it’s the fact that he was signing cards at a convention, so the fan boy joke was informed by that situation.

            A meme doesn’t need a multitude of variations to be considered a meme, that’s just going viral. It also doesn’t need to be a photoshopped image, changing the text is creation of a new meme, think advice animals. Simply changing how the image is received by a viewer is enough to be a meme, it’s nothing more complicated than that.

        • Kethal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I use the first definition. To use the word simply to mean a picture that is shared doesn’t really match the original usage of this word. The act of sharing pictures is a meme. Some pictures that get shared a lot are memes. Mark Hamill writing on a picture is something obviously some people call a meme, but I think those people are using a new, and as far as I can tell, pointless, meaning of the word.

        • Poiar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For it to be a meme, other people should also be doing something similar optimally in different variations - either before or after he signed these. For example to burn a funny message + signature in wood.

          If this happened, idk. Potentially, this was/became a meme

            • Kethal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I am pretty sure you still fail to understand the difference between the original meaning of the word and the meaning that you are using. www.tfd.com/meme.

              By the original definition, no, it’s not a meme. By the definition that you appear to be using, an image that has been modified, then sure, it’s a meme.

              • Sunforged@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I think you’re getting really tunnel visioned on a single definition and not taking into account the context to which we are interacting, which is on the internet. An internet meme is not the same exact concept as what Dawkins originally was conveying when he coined the term meme. I’m not out here in academia so you’ll have to forgive my shorthand of internet meme to just meme. In my defense before all you meme Scholars got on my case, the internet was included in my thesis title. Are the card signatures memes in a generational sense? No, but yet here we are discussing them four decades later, so maybe?

                An internet meme has two defining characteristics in reproduction and intertextuality. Were they reproduced? Before today not to my knowledge, they could have been as I have demonstrated. However not every gene strain reproduces, are they less of a gene than others that do? If memes are the cultural analogues to genes then the capability to reproduce is what is needed. If the original image is a template then do his jokes count as a single reproduction? As for intertextuality well Mark did that by changing the context of the original image.

                Is it a meme now?

              • Sunforged@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Says someone that never makes OC.

                You also replied to the weakest one of the bunch.

    • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve even seen recent writers struggle to describe self-replicating ideas as “mind-viruses” and the like. I dunno, if only there was already a word for that guys!

  • Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wew. Lots of Lucas and Disney fanbois it looks like based on the vitriol. I’m GenX. We lived through the “Gap of SW” where we made do with mid-good SW novels, toys, games, cameos and the occasional SW-related tv movies. We were so hyped to the heavens for the Prequels that we didn’t see the warning signs when Lucas shat on SW by making the Special Editions. I walked out of the cinema in confusion after watching TPM. It’s like a Believer being told by God himself that your religion is a sham. Lucas is a sfx visionary and world builder but he is a hack in script writing and needed people to tell him off. The actors like Mark Hamill and Harrison Ford frequently refused to act out the lines Lucas wrote. Carrie Fisher even became a script doctor due to her experience with Lucas’ terrible scripts.

    • hamburglar26@wilbo.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think my favorite Star Wars experiences overall are still the Dark Forces series and the X-Wing / Tie Fighter series. They expanded so well on what we had at the time and definitely messed with my expectations when the newer trilogies came out.

  • solstice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I saw mark Hamill perform in a play once called Six dance lessons in six weeks. Rue Mclanahan from the Golden Girls played the female lead. This was like 20+ years ago now I guess.

    It was actually a really good play and I got to meet him during the opening night party afterwards. I was an idiot kid and asked him to sign the playbill with a MTFBWY or something dumb like that. He was visibly miffed, understandably, but still politely signed it “forcefully yours.”

    It wasn’t until years later that I realized it was kind of rude of me to ask for that at the opening night party of a play he just worked really hard on. Must be real annoying having fanboys pestering you about a shitty movie you did decades ago. Anyway he seemed nice enough and it was a really good play. I got a pic with him around here somewhere, maybe I’ll post if there’s any interest.

    • Sunforged@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh man, at least you reflected on that one. Forcefully yours is some top tier passive aggressive malicious compliance though, too funny.

  • Coeus@coeus.sbs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I went to Star Wars Celebration VI back in 2012 and it was $225 to get Mark Hammil’s autograph. I opted instead to get Peter Mayhew’s for $60. RIP Mr. Mayhew.

  • Margot Robbie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    But he’s too famous of an actor to write funny things, everybody knows that after you’ve been in a couple of big movies, you aren’t allowed to do funny bits on the Internet anymore.

    Maybe he’s one of those “meme accounts” or something.

  • Beefalo@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fuckin bong joke is majestic. I assume he was pulling these out of his ass at signings, too. Nice handwriting, Mark.

    I could never be famous enough to sign stuff, people would get it back like what the fuck is this? My sig would be all inconsistent, too. Hamill is a pro, though. Even back then.

    You know? He handled going from nobody to Luke Skywalker pretty damned well all things considered.