Hey all! My team at work is struggling with growing pains of getting into a formalized review process, so I was wondering if any of you guys have some things to live or die by in your code reviews. How much of it is manual, or how much is just static code analysis + style guide stuff, etc?

  • flintcedar@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is trunk based way. Although I have not used it heavily at work. https://trunkbaseddevelopment.com/

    My team is very small (3 people). We mostly trust each other on just merging away without PR reviews. Although we ask for reviews when in doubt during development, not when ready to merge. Mostly for asking ideas on where to put stuff.

    On my previous work, we were like a 15+ dev team, doing mandatory PR reviews before merging and doing the shotgun request (ping @review_channel and pray). I hated it.