earlyadopter@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoDesigners vs Programmerssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down12
arrow-up163arrow-down1imageDesigners vs Programmerssh.itjust.worksearlyadopter@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squareZILtoid1991@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoBad comparison. The scale is way greater. I can’t go through multiple terabytes of reference images. As an artist, that’s my issue with current models. It shouldn’t be opted-in by default with questionable opt-out options.
minus-squareKnighthawk 0811@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agobut that’s exactly how the models are being trained. by manually going through all the images and describing them. and you can’t really complain that computers go through data at a greater scale than humans… that’s the whole point. that argument doesn’t hold
Bad comparison. The scale is way greater. I can’t go through multiple terabytes of reference images.
As an artist, that’s my issue with current models. It shouldn’t be opted-in by default with questionable opt-out options.
but that’s exactly how the models are being trained. by manually going through all the images and describing them.
and you can’t really complain that computers go through data at a greater scale than humans… that’s the whole point. that argument doesn’t hold