• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    And the Buran system was more impressive than the shuttle, capable of completely automated flight!

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t think it was ever confirmed. They only flew the thing once, which was confirmed. Anything else claiming superior tech I’d call USSR propaganda.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not sure whether the orbital flight counts as test or operational, but that one. The prior test flights only had automated landings.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      So they say but since it never even went into space it’s a bold claim.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m reading that it orbited at an altitude of up to 263 km, well above the Karman line. Is that not space?

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Well that’s debatable but really the point is it never did a re-entry so we really don’t know how reusable it would have been.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            If it didn’t do a reentry, how did it get down from that altitude?

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 hours ago

              By landing?

              Reentry doesn’t mean flying downwards it means actually coming in at a high enough speed to generate heating. Otherwise it’s just falling.

              • catloaf@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                19 hours ago

                I’m pretty sure any reentry from orbit is going to involve high enough speeds to generate heating.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        It’s just like their foxbat claims…turned out it was a flying brick.

        Edit: apparently I pissed off some tankies lol

        It’s well known that the foxbat was heavily exaggerated in its capabilities. It’s how we ended up with the f15 and it’s insane capabilities. Just like now russia fighting in Ukraine, paper tiger.