• Frater Mus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is no separate law of deadly force for LEOs and citizenry, which is why the “f33red for muh life!!!” defense is so common among LEOs.

    not holding them to a high standard contributes to their rates of malicious behavior.

    I respectfully disagree. IMO a higher standard just incentivizes them to hide misconduct rather than owning up to it. Again back to the Classics: “Plato taught that, however laudable justice may be, one cannot expect prodigies of virtue from ordinary people.” <-- two Plato quotes in one day is not my usual method of discourse!

    • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There is no separate law of deadly force

      In the US, qualified immunity means that they are effectively acting under a different set of laws while on the job.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      IMO a higher standard just incentivizes them to hide misconduct rather than owning up to it.

      Oh, so you are a bootlicker.

    • bluegreenzeros@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      What alternative would you suggest? If they cannot hold them to a higher standard in fear of them lying about it, then how would you approach this sort of restructuring of the police with high quality cops?

      If we just say it’ll be a slow process, and we have to change how we hire, how will that actually be put into practice? Would the current police not fight to maintain their privilege? Instead of lying and covering up Mal practice, they would do the same in their hiring practices.

      The only option to it in my view IS to hold them to a higher standard, and the attempts by the public to hold them to a higher standard IS the citizenry demanding a better PD.