Since hypnotherapy can be effective for a percentage of the population for various treatments, why is it not offered as a standard therapy for everyone in terms of setting them up for health benefits at a younger age? For example, some people claim to have had successful results with hypnotherapy as a smoking cessation tool. If it’s effective, why is it not offered more widely as a smoking prevention tool, or healthy eating tool, or any other pro-healthy lifestyle aid before those bad habits are formed? Preventing smoking, or suggesting healthy food habits at a young age would save the NHS (or other public healthcare provider) billions long-term if it was effective. It seems like, if hypnotherapy is generally accepted as a mechanism to treat certain conditions (which it appears to be in various quarters of traditional medicine), why is it used more as a reactive treatment rather than a proactive one?
Yeah there’s a lot of studies, but as with all medicine, research is ongoing. It’s very far from pseudo-science.
There’s plenty of information available with regards to its use within (traditional, licensed) medical organisations.
This does not mean that it accepted for use in medical practice. In fact the amount of studies done that have not moved hypnotherapy into the field of medical practice, are a body of good evidence which makes that very unlikely to ever happen.
In the UK, all of that information is with regards to voluntary use and warnings about the possible dangers of doing so.
The US could be different in certain areas, but that isn’t blanket and shouldn’t be accepted as such.
Hypnotherapy is not medicine, any more than a brisk walk is. It can help with other things if done properly, but it can just as easily cause damage.
I hope this clarifies the situation.
I’m as sceptical as anyone, but hypnotherapy is absolutely very much accepted in areas of UK medicine, and if you want to suggest it’s the same as a brisk walk, you may as well dismiss much of the field of psychiatry at the same time.
The Royal College of Psychiatrists go into detail about its use by healthcare professionals and training is also provided for many healthcare professionals in the UK by the British Society of Clinical and Academic Hypnosis which apparently requires applicants to hold medical qualifications.
Those areas are defined by the NHS specifically as complementary or alternative therapies. In other words, not part of general practition and similar to other, general health advice.
From your link -
Very much like advice to rest after ill health, or perhaps as part of a programme to increase fitness we may receive advice to take regular brisk walks.
Hypnotherapy is not medicine. It will never be the primary course of any treatment. But I have also said that it can help, which is as much as any medical professional will agree with.
Trying to give it any further weight, as you are, isn’t helpful and could be harmful. Please don’t do that.
Mate, I literally provided a link to an established medical organisation and their details from it. I’m not giving it weight, the Royal College of Psychiatrists is.
Complementary therapy, whether you agree with it or not, is very often recommended by UK practitioners.
Even the NHS offer hypnotherapy under certain circumstances! They literally tell you to speak to your GP to see if you can see a hypnotherapist on the NHS
It’s really not difficult to find examples of hypnotherapy being offered by NHS doctors in the UK. Whatever your definition of ‘not medicine’ is, there appear to be plenty of medically licensed practitioners in the UK who would argue otherwise.