• Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    Activision, Ubisoft, and EA, all multibillion game dev company, said they’ll be using generative AI to make their game, so no, it’s not really obvious. It’s also mentioned in the article

    Nintendo’s stance differs from that of other gaming giants. Earlier this year, Ubisoft introduced Project Neural Nexus NEO NPCs, which uses generative AI to simulate in-game conversations and interactions with NPCs.

    Similarly, Square Enix President Takashi Kiryu views generative AI as a business opportunity to create new content using cutting-edge technologies. Electronic Arts (EA) has also embraced generative AI, with CEO Andrew Wilson predicting that over half of EA’s development processes will benefit from advancements in generative AI.

    The investor probably heard it’s a trendy thing that can make better profit, so they asked nintendo about it in the briefing.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Those are the companies that have contributed to the fast churn of creatives getting overworked and leaving the industry, leaving their projects to be driven entirely by excess man-hours and lack of innovation.

      • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I doubt most console or phone does, one workaround is to have a server that process everything then send the result to the client side, be it a generated video, picture, or text, i bet most AI stuff is done this way, they don’t download all the required data and process locally.

        Also generative AI doesn’t mean it need to be generated live ingame, it can be dialog script, concept art, all sort of production stuff.