• Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    My point is that involving the gun makes it terrorism by the same principle of escalation.

    It’s not a robery, it’s a near death experience where money might change hands.

    Gun violence is gun violence. It is all attempted murder and terrorism. Fact that some people want money out of it is irrelevant, it is still terrorism.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Words have definitions. Real life has different situations. Those situations have different motives and results, even if they share features. Edit you can’t just declare everything violent terroristic.

      It’s silly to assume that the same actions would have the same impacts on two very different types of crime, despite both of those crimes having a gun.

      For example: red flag laws where family or certain professionals can bring forward action to take guns away from someone or get them certain care. This is triggered by said folks detecting or acknowledging certain concerning behaviors in someone who might carry out a mass shooting.

      This wouldn’t help with someone considering a robbery, as their pattern of behavior (edit and motivation) isn’t the same.

      I am not advocating for red flag laws, or discounting them. That’s not the point.