• @Spectacle8011A
    link
    2611 months ago

    Its still open source. You can still view the source code. That’s what open source is.

    “Open Source” does not, and has never only meant, “you can view the source code”. This is the Open Source Definition: https://opensource.org/osd/

    Relevant excerpt:

    1. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor

    The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research.

    The Open Source Definition is very specific, and this license does not meet it. This license is, as it calls itself, “source-available”.

    If the OSI had obtained that trademark in 1999 on “Open Source”, it would be abundantly clear what software really is and is not open source https://opensource.org/pressreleases/certified-open-source.php/