I wholeheartedly agree with this blog post. I believe someone on here yesterday was asking about config file locations and setting them manually. This is in the same vein. I can’t tell you how many times a command line method for discovering the location of a config file would have saved me 30 minutes of googling.

  • I_Miss_Daniel
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    (Windows) Resource Monitor, disk tab, tick the process, see what files it opens and closes.

    Also the usual %programdata% and the two %appdata% find most things.

    • exscape
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Do things stay in that list when they are not used (since they would be opened and closed in far less than a second)? If so that’s pretty cool.

      If not, you can use Process Monitor to check this. That’s what I usually do.

    • bionade24
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      The *nix equivalent is the lsof command. This doesn’t help you finding out in which hierarchy config files are parsed when the program accesses multiple ones, which is often the case.

      • elmicha
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        You can use something like strace -eopen -f -o strace.out the_program to find all files that the program tried or succeeded to open. Then you can try to find the config file(s) in strace.out.

        • bionade24
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          You still don’t know which location is preffered and how get they get merged. In my experience, digging into the source is the most straighforward. But my usual problem is more that the config option doesn’t do at all what the documentation says it does.

            • @Hexorg@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Yes, though if two different files allow for the same config key - you’re stuck opening both to check

              • bionade24
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                And you still couldn’t be sure, could be parsed the other way around for historic reasons.
                Just reading the source code (if possible ofc) is imho easier than reading.