Thank you for the opportunity to teach.

If my grandmother had wheels she’d be a tea trolley.

Minimization.

Right now the reality is the Donald Trump is going to take office because a lot of people didn’t vote for the alternative.

Red herring.

All the ‘what if…?’ games in the world isn’t going to change that.

Minimization.

This is a bit better than typical nonsense because there’s two tactics in a sandwich. Next is usually ad hominem. But, this one may have another trick up their sleeve.

OK, what else do you suggest?

Not many ask.

Because of idealism, they seem to ask for something that doesn’t exist and not accept anything else.

This is my issue with almost everyone. They believe they already know what others think, that no one could possibly have an alternative that they’ve not already considered.

My suggestions are as follows: Consider that your scope of evaluation is only one cycle. As a consequence there may be nuance in system function that you’d not considered. Then ask the same question but in good faith.

Ah yes, so the best option is to not vote and let them succeed unimpeded.

Your very first lines are a false dichotomy.

Accelerationism is more ethical than neoliberal denial. By voting for the bigger evil you’ve made yourself the lesser evil.

If 5% of the general election popular vote for POTUS, knowing that the candidate cannot win, still voted for the Green Party platform then what effect would that have upon the Democratic Party platform?

On a five point difficulty scale this is a two. The test gets way harder than this.

It’s a tactic of the propaganda machine to redefine and demonize our semantic.

What you’re missing is the semantic and context inherent a syllabus. If you find a mentor that helps develop a syllabus then it’ll become much easier to find learning resources.

That’s the sound of da beast.

They’re mask-on anarcho-capitalists.

One might also note that in that context “What is Caesar’s” could be responded to with “nothing.”

The New Testament is mostly Jesus then Paul repeatedly telling everyone with increasing amounts of frustration,

Reason from principles to situation for yourselves.

It’s fallacy fallacy. I got close to the right answer for highly-questionable subjective reasoning that’s barely better than luck.

Fixed it for you.

We know that you’re here, in this thread. Don’t tell us what you’re doing right now or we’ll collapse the universe.

At present there’s only one fork on the above process. That didn’t seem right to me.

Saul of Tarsus AKA Paul the Apostle

Adding to “set home instance”

Below the filter and sort fields is a button for an instance filter.

I think I hear about a school shooting about once every two or three months. And, I believe underreporting at a national level paired with myself not having time to keep up means that I hear about roughly one in every hundred shootings.

Typically there’s about 180 days of school per year.

Crunching some vague math, my guess seems preposterous: ~340 school shootings in 2024. That’s almost two per day. But, the more I thought about it the less preposterous it seemed.

TL;DR - My guess is a seemingly preposterous 340 school shootings in 2024, or almost 2 per school day.

You can’t influence it in primaries. If the results don’t fit the predetermined narrative then the DNC will simply ignore them.