I would really rather that these were actual examples, and not conspiracy theories. We all have our own unsubstantiated ideas about what shadowy no-gooders are doing, but I’d rather hear about things that are actually happening.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      A lot of leftists (and I hardly ever saw it before coming on Lemmy) use ‘Liberal’ to mean Classic or Neo Liberal - basically a synonym of capitalist… That’s not at all what it means in American politics, where it means the opposite of Conservative. If we used that definition, Conservatives would be called Liberals as well as Liberals being Liberals, which obviously makes no sense for US lingo. However, they both are Liberals in the neo/classic sense as most US Liberals aren’t calling for communism.

      • IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The conservatives are only liberal in the economic sense. They are the party of book banning, anti-abortion and anti-lgbtq. Liberalism is also about human rights and freedoms. But just because you think gays should be allowed to marry and acces to have an abortion should be a right that doesn’t put you left on the political spectrum or even make you a progressive. Since that is pretty much a centrist political position in the rest of the world. Most Democrats are liberal in the economic sense but also in the human liberty sense. But only a few Democrats in the house and senate can be truly called progressives. Since most Democrats are fine with the status quo and aren’t pushing society forward. They are just fighting of the attacks of the GOP

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Right, I agree. The progressive side of the US is not fairly represented by Democrats nationally.

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s not at all what it means in American politics

        Two red scares and a cold war created an Orwellian memory hole such that Americans don’t even have the words anymore. It’s double-plus ungood.

    • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Liberalism isn’t necessarily a left wing ideology.

      It’s an inherently right wing ideology lol. They’re just conservatives that want/like to think they’re progressive.

    • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Liberal economic theories beleive the free market is the best solution generally, but allow the free market to be intervened in or even entirely supplanted in cases of market failure or where significant social problems arise from private ownership. There is a lot of debate inside liberalism as to when a market has failed, or when a social issue requires intervention, which is why sometimes you will see centrist liberals and left liberals arguing. Just look at Canada with our Liberal Party, its a big tent party with a small social democrat rump(since most social Dems are NDP), a larger social liberal / left liberal group, as well as some centrist and “blue liberals” (these would be right liberals, who are harder to convince about market failures).

      Liberalism can be progressive, especially when the main thrust of a liberal party is left liberal or social liberal. Some Liberal parties are progressive sometimes, then more centrist at others as members and the membership changes over the years (or often on the strength and leanings of their leader). All still liberalism.